A Safeguarding Adults Review (SAR) is a statutory review process carried out when an adult with care and support needs dies or experiences significant harm, and it is suspected that abuse or neglect played a role in the incident.
This process is mandated under the Care Act 2014 and aims to identify learning to prevent future instances of abuse and neglect. Here’s a detailed explanation of SARs in health and social care:
Legal Framework
SARs are established under the Care Act 2014, specifically Section 44, which places a legal duty on Safeguarding Adults Boards (SABs) to conduct these reviews.
Purpose
The primary objectives of a SAR are to:
- Identify lessons to be learnt from the case.
- Ensure these lessons are applied to improve future practice.
- Prevent similar harm from occurring to other adults in the future.
- Promote a culture of continuous learning and improvement across the organisations involved.
Criteria for Conducting a SAR
A SAR must be conducted if:
- An adult in the local authority area dies as a result of abuse or neglect, whether known or suspected, and there is concern that partner agencies could have worked more effectively to protect the individual.
- An adult is alive but has experienced serious abuse or neglect, and again, there are concerns about the efficacy of multi-agency working to safeguard the individual.
The SAB may also choose to carry out a SAR in other situations where it believes there are valuable lessons to be learnt.
Scope and Methodology
The scope and methodology of a SAR can vary depending on the complexity and circumstances of the case. Generally, the review might include:
- Chronological timelines from agencies involved.
- Analysis of the decision-making processes followed by the agencies.
- Interviews with those involved, including professionals and, if appropriate, the affected individual or their family.
- Examination of organisational procedures and inter-agency communication.
Multi-Agency Involvement
SARs are inherently multi-agency reviews, meaning that various organisations that were involved with the adult in question, such as health services, social care, police, housing services, and others, collaborate to investigate and contribute to the review.
Findings and Recommendations
Upon conclusion of the review, the SAR will produce a report outlining:
- Facts of the case.
- A detailed analysis of where and how things went wrong.
- Lessons learnt.
- Recommendations for improvements in practice, policy, and inter-agency work.
Publication and Dissemination
While the detailed findings of a SAR may often remain confidential to protect the privacy and dignity of the adult and their family, an executive summary, or key findings are usually published. The SAB ensures that the lessons learnt and recommendations are disseminated to all relevant agencies to implement the needed changes.
Follow-Up
It is importantthat SARs lead to tangible changes. Thus, SABs are responsible for ensuring that the recommendations are acted upon. This can involve:
- Development or revision of policies and procedures.
- Training and development initiatives for staff.
- Strengthening of inter-agency collaboration and communication.
Accountability
SABs are held accountable for initiating and overseeing SARs. They also ensure that the process is transparent and that all agencies involved are committed to improving safeguarding practices based on the review’s findings.
The Need for SARs
SARs are a really important part of the safeguarding framework as they not only offer a mechanism for understanding what went wrong in particular cases but also drive continuous improvement across the sector. By learning from adverse events, agencies can enhance their preventative measures, thereby fostering safer environments for vulnerable adults.
Challenges
Conducting SARs comes with challenges, such as:
- Coordinating across multiple agencies.
- Ensuring timely and comprehensive information sharing.
- Balancing transparency with confidentiality to protect individuals’ privacy.
- Implementing the recommendations effectively across different organisations.
In summary, a Safeguarding Adults Review is an important tool aimed at protecting vulnerable adults by learning from serious incidents involving abuse or neglect. It helps to pinpoint systemic issues and areas for improvement, encouraging a proactive approach to safeguarding that influences policy, practice, and inter-agency collaboration across the health and social care spectrum. The review process involves a thorough examination of the circumstances leading to the incident and the responses of relevant agencies. It also requires the input of the designated safeguarding lead within each organization involved to ensure a comprehensive and coordinated approach to safeguarding vulnerable adults. By facilitating a multi-agency approach, Safeguarding Adults Reviews promote accountability and drive continuous improvement in safeguarding practices.
Further Reading and Resources
- Safeguarding Adults Reviews (SARs) – SCIE
Explains that Safeguarding Adults Reviews are a statutory requirement for Safeguarding Adults Boards, intended to identify how to improve adult safeguarding practice by understanding what helps or hinders multi-agency work. - Safeguarding Adults Reviews (SARs) under the Care Act – SCIE
Clarifies that under the Care Act 2014, SARs aim to “promote effective learning and improvement action to prevent future deaths or serious harm occurring again” and are not intended to attribute blame. - What are Safeguarding Adult Reviews? – Newham Council
Defines SARs as a multi-agency review process seeking to determine what could have been done differently to prevent serious harm or death, emphasising that their purpose is learning rather than blame. - Briefing for practitioners – Analysis of Safeguarding Adults Reviews – Local Government Association
Summarises the conditions under which SARs are required—namely when an adult with care and support needs has died or suffered serious harm from abuse or neglect potentially due to collaborative failure—and highlights lessons learned such as self-neglect prevalence and shortfalls in mental capacity consideration and risk management. - Safeguarding Adult Reviews (SARs) – Devon Safeguarding Adults Partnership
Outlines that SARs—formerly known as Serious Case Reviews—are conducted when there is concern that agencies could have worked more effectively to protect an adult, with the objective of learning lessons, reviewing procedures and improving inter-agency practice. - Safeguarding Adult Reviews (SAR) Policy and Procedure – Salford Adult Safeguarding Board
Details the statutory duty under Section 44 of the Care Act 2014 for both mandatory and discretionary SARs, clarifying that the purpose is to review organisational and procedural effectiveness—and not to reinvestigate, apportion blame, or address negligence—and includes guidance on principles and types of review.
Subscribe to Newsletter
Get the latest news and updates from Care Learning and be first to know about our free courses when they launch.
